Why I Hate Beer Kits
I don't really hate beer kits.
Well, I try not to hate beer kits.
Beer kits have some good points.
I just can't get past the drawbacks inherent of many... most... all kits.
Oh who am I fooling? I hate beer kits for one reason.
First however let me start with why beer kits are valuable. The brewer doesn't have to source a recipe. They don't have to figure how much of everything they need. It's all included in the kit. Since a majority of kit users are new to brewing these can help them make some very good beer right out of the gate. Even seasoned brewers find them very convenient and worthwhile.
The reason to hate kits however lies in the instructions that come with them. Step Six in the included picture is the perfect example of crappy instructions. Have you ever run into any advice so unsound?
To suggest to a new brewer that they should be monitoring the krausen to determine when it falls means that the brewer will be removing the lid of the brew bucket ("pail") to check. This will lead to oxidized beer.
Next comes the directions to transfer the beer to a secondary vessel. The first error is the time frame given and the "hazardous" warning in the box. How can anyone suggest racking to secondary after just 5 days? And suggest that you should "never" let beer sit in the primary fermenter longer than that? For starters, an average ale is not finished fermenting at just 5 days. You are removing the beer off of the yeast before the yeast has finished its job! No wonder we see so many questions on homebrew forums about FG being too high.
In those same directions comes the perpetuated myth of using a secondary step. This step is not necessary and creates more risk than benefit. Use of a secondary was once considered as a standard practice 30 years ago but even those1990's stalwarts of the process now say that the perceived benefits were not true and that the risks are too high. This can also lead to oxidation.
Why would the makers of a product provide instruction that can result in almost certain failure for their customers? Because these instructions were probably written 30+ years ago and have never been updated.
The reason to hate kits however lies in the instructions that come with them. Step Six in the included picture is the perfect example of crappy instructions. Have you ever run into any advice so unsound?
To suggest to a new brewer that they should be monitoring the krausen to determine when it falls means that the brewer will be removing the lid of the brew bucket ("pail") to check. This will lead to oxidized beer.
Next comes the directions to transfer the beer to a secondary vessel. The first error is the time frame given and the "hazardous" warning in the box. How can anyone suggest racking to secondary after just 5 days? And suggest that you should "never" let beer sit in the primary fermenter longer than that? For starters, an average ale is not finished fermenting at just 5 days. You are removing the beer off of the yeast before the yeast has finished its job! No wonder we see so many questions on homebrew forums about FG being too high.
In those same directions comes the perpetuated myth of using a secondary step. This step is not necessary and creates more risk than benefit. Use of a secondary was once considered as a standard practice 30 years ago but even those1990's stalwarts of the process now say that the perceived benefits were not true and that the risks are too high. This can also lead to oxidation.
Why would the makers of a product provide instruction that can result in almost certain failure for their customers? Because these instructions were probably written 30+ years ago and have never been updated.
Just because they printed it doesn't make it right.